Miscalculating the Impact of Africa’s Youth
Africa is blessed with many natural resources – from diamonds and other precious stones to petroleum and natural gas to strategic minerals on which the modern world relies. However, Africa’s greatest natural resource is its people, especially its youth.
Africa has the youngest population in the world, with 70% of sub-Saharan
Africa under the age of 30. This
makes Africa potentially a tremendous consumer market, provided these young
people escape poverty and accumulate sufficient buying power. It also gives Africa a tremendous pool of
labor, provided young African are sufficiently trained and remain on the continent
rather than become part of Africa’s brain drain.
There
continues to be a great deal of turmoil in Africa these days. Even the number of coups and unconstitutional
changes in government are again on the rise.
Unfortunately, this African youth resource is not serving as the
solution to its problems, but rather became part of kindling for its social fires. The Africa
Center for Strategic Studies, in a report by Catherine Lena Kelly, attributes
this African turmoil to several factors.
“As violent extremist groups have gained a foothold in parts of
the Sahel in recent years, one of their strategies has been to exploit
communities’ grievances over access to justice. It’s a potent message,” Kelly
wrote. “Human rights abuses by security sector actors and perceptions of unjust
treatment by government officials are key determinants of individuals’
decisions to join violent extremist groups in the Sahel, the Lake Chad Basin and
the Horn of Africa.”
Certainly,
African citizens are much less likely these days to accept brutalization by
security forces, and some have braved harsh responses from governments. I went on two Congressional delegations in
2005 to meet with Ethiopians in the aftermath of violent repression by the
then-government in response to what many thought was a manipulated election
result. The violent aftermath, in which
many citizens, especially students, were killed and thousands more jailed had
reverberations that still affect politics in that country today.
Kelly
further cites a rise in farmer-herder violence in recent years, spurred by
growing population and land pressures in the context of climate change, leading
to competing claims over access to land. Communal land claims and the inability of
some governments to create a system for effectively registering land and
legally transferring ownership is one issue, but another is the shifting of
boundaries. For example, in Nigeria, the
paths traditionally taken by cattle herders have been disturbed by government-mandated
changes in local boundaries without regard to the need for animals to have
grazing land on their journey through the country or for farmers to have their land
protected from being overrun illegally.
In central Nigeria, I was told on one delegation visit that herder and
farm youth were cooperating in cattle theft for profit.
She
further states that more than 80 percent of Africa’s population growth in the
years ahead is expected to take place in cities, contributing to a rapid expansion
of informal settlements in many of Africa’s urban areas. The growing share of
African urban dwellers living in these informal settlements underscores the
urgency of protecting the civil liberties and property rights of these
citizens. In Zimbabwe during the 2005
Murambatsvina (“Take Out the Trash”) campaign by the government at the time,
informal settlements were bulldozed and families were turned out of their homes
in the dead of the southern African winter.
It turned out that some of those homes had been legally registered. Farm youth coming to cities for greater
opportunities found themselves faced with no way to make a legal living nor
access to secure housing.
The
positive impact of youth is being perverted by lack of opportunity and the mistreatment
of African citizens – young and old – by governments desperate to hold onto
power. “The increased activism by Africa’s growing youth movement is largely
focused on matters of justice, such as mediating conflicts in their
communities, challenging presidents who defy term limits, and promoting civic
engagement,” Kelly wrote.
In
a May 2013 article in the United Nations publication Africa Renewal, the
question was posed as to whether Africa’s youth comprised an opportunity for
the continent or a ”ticking time bomb”.
The article by writer Kingsley Ighobor cited the example of the 2012
unrest in Senegal as an example of how youth could contribute to significant
change.
“Senegalese opposition politicians denounced the
country’s high unemployment rate to mobilize youth against former President
Abdoulaye Wade in the country’s 2012 presidential election. Joblessness was one
of the main issues that drove the country’s many young people into the streets
and to the voting stations to press for a change of government. At least six
people died in the protests, and President Wade was defeated by the current
leader, Macky Sall,” Ighobor wrote.
“The key lesson from Senegal’s
election violence is that youth unemployment, which is 15 per cent in that
country, can fuel the fire of political violence and civil unrest. A World Bank
survey in 2011 showed that about 40% of those who join rebel movements say they
are motivated by a lack of jobs.”
In
her 2010 book Youth and Post-Conflict
Reconstruction: Agents of Change, author Stephanie
Schwartz wrote that in conflict and
post-conflict situations, youth constituted a reservoir of energy. Some young
people choose to fight or are forced into a life of violence.
Others are able to work to improve their communities, contribute to
peacebuilding, reconciliation and reconstruction, and become invested in
their countries’ future peace.
In fact, the so-called Arab Spring
pro-democracy movement in 2010-11 started the challenge to authoritarian
regimes in North Africa and the Middle East, beginning when protests in Tunisia and Egypt toppled
their regimes in quick succession.
The self-immolation of a 26-year-old street vendor, Mohammed Bouazizi, who
was protesting his unfair treatment by local officials, initiated a protest
movement dubbed the “Jasmine Revolution” in the media. It quickly spread through the country, and
when the Tunisian government attempted to end the unrest by using violence
against street demonstrations and by offering political and economic concessions,
that strategy failed. Protests soon overwhelmed the country’s security forces,
compelling President Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali to step down and flee the
country on January 14, 2011. In October 2011, Tunisians participated in a free
election to choose members of a council tasked with drafting a new
constitution, and a democratically chosen president and prime minister took
office in December 2011, with a new constitution promulgated in January
2014.
Inspired by Ben Ali’s ouster in Tunisia, similar protests
were quickly organized among young Egyptians through social media, creating
out massive crowds across Egypt on January 25, 2011. As in Tunisia, the
Egyptian government also tried and failed to control protests by offering
concessions while cracking down violently against protesters, but after several
days of massive demonstrations and clashes between protesters and security
forces in Cairo and around the country, a turning point came at the end of
the month when the Egyptian army, in contrast to the police, announced that it
would refuse to use force against protesters calling for the removal of President
Hosni Mubarek. He left office on February 11, 2011, after nearly 30 years,
ceding power to a council of senior military officers. The military enjoyed
high public approval in the period before a new government was formed, but
by prioritizing stability over democratic transition its popularity was
diminished, and a period of instability was initiated.
In contrast to those two examples, on February
20, 2011, a movement began in Morocco that publicly demanded a constitutional
monarchy in which an elected and accountable government would have control over
the country’s social, economic, and security policies. Across the country, rallies
began in which tens of thousands of Moroccans participated. At the heart of
this movement’s demands were the role of the King, who, since independence, had
been in control of all senior governmental and military appointments. Unlike
its counterparts to the east, however, the February 20 movement did not openly
ask for the removal of Mohamed VI from office or for the abolition of the monarchy.
Moreover, while Morocco’s security apparatus had
been involved in violence against protesters around the country, its reputation
had never been nearly as bad as that of its counterpart in Tunisia or Egypt. As
a result, the movement asked for critical constitutional reforms rather than outright
revolution. Even the movement’s core constitutional demands, such as the
election of the prime minister by the parliament, not by the King, had already
been openly addressed and debated in the press and political party offices for
two decades. Thus, change came to this
liberal bastion of democracy in North Africa without the overthrow of the
regime, through legally instituted reforms.
Young people in Africa, energized over the last
decade by successes in pushing for political change and informed by access to
social media, continue to either offer hope for Africa’s progress or threaten
chaos if not incorporated into democracy and governance.
“It is
important that youth is involved in decision making. It is important that we as
young people are recognised as equal partners and as right holders – not only
as victims”, said Nickson Kasolene, the youth and civil society representative
of the Coordination Meeting of Youth Organisations at the Africa Regional
Review – the regional preparatory meeting for LDC5 held virtually in
Malawi recently.
Indeed, it is
long past time for African governments to decide whether its youth will be part
of the effort to effectively address its challenges or continue to be contributors
to its problems.
Comments
Post a Comment