How Long Will Religious Disputes Plague Nigeria?
I’ve written previously about Nigeria being the “essential nation” in Africa. According to the Congressional Research Service (CRS), successive U.S. Administrations have described the U.S. partnership with Nigeria as among the most important bilateral relationships on the continent: Nigeria is the United States’ second-largest trade partner and third-largest destination for U.S. foreign direct investment in Africa, and it routinely ranks among the top annual recipients of U.S. foreign assistance globally. CRS estimates that Nigeria is poised to overtake the United States as the third most populous country in the world by 2050, with a population expected to exceed 400 million. Its population of 219 million is ethnically, linguistically and religiously diverse.
When I visited during
President Bill Clinton’s visit there in August 2000, I suggested to several
Nigerian officials and civil society representatives that the continent’s most
populous country must use its natural and human resources to successfully
compete with South Africa for primacy among African nations. South Africa then had a problematic crime and
labor situation and has since seen xenophobia increase greatly, along with
violence, increasing its social and economic impediments. Yet Nigeria seems destined to destruct itself
over religious persecution and religiously inspired violence. It is no mistake that Nigeria has been called
the most dangerous place on Earth for Christians.
Open Doors,
a civil society group that monitors religious persecution, described the
situation in Nigeria in dire terms.
“Persecution
in Nigeria is, simply put, brutally violent. In much of northern Nigeria,
Christians live their lives under the constant threat of attack from Boko
Haram, the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP), Fulani militants and
criminals who kidnap and murder with few consequences. While all citizens of
northern Nigeria are subject to threats and violence, Christians are often
specifically targeted because of their faith — ISWAP and Boko Haram want to
eliminate the Christian presence in Nigeria, and Muslim Fulani militants attack
Christian villages specifically,” the organization writes. “In addition to the
violence risks, Christians in some of Nigeria’s northern states also live under
Shariah law, where they face discrimination and treatment as second-class
citizens. Christians who convert from Islam also face rejection from their
families, often pressured to recant their faith in Jesus; sometimes, they are
even violently attacked.”
Unfortunately,
this religious conflict in Nigeria is not new, but it is more driven in recent
years by extremist elements than the Nigerian public generally. A 2020 Afrobarometer
survey found that a large majority of Nigerian respondents would be content or
would not care if their neighbor practiced a religion other than their own.
State discrimination along religious lines has periodically roiled interfaith
relations, however. Many Christians see
job discrimination in government positions favoring Muslims, and Nigeria has
seen growing violence along religious lines, particularly in religiously mixed
zones of the north.
The country
is divided between Christians and Muslims – the North is predominantly Muslim,
while the South and East are predominantly Christian. Muslims may not be universally trusted or liked
in the South and East, but they are not hounded and killed as Christians have
been in the North. It must be noted,
though, that Christians in Nigeria don’t consider converts as requiring
punishment. Decades ago, during the
various cases of redrawing of Nigeria’s states, the Christian-Muslim animosity
grew due to minorities becoming majorities overnight. Moreover, both Muslims and Christians took
opportunities to proselytize in their new communities despite the hard feelings
it would surely create. There could have
been détente on this matter, but leadership among both groups declined to do
the diplomacy necessary to make that happen, allowing the most extreme elements
to lead the way on this with predictable results.
Open Doors
describes the continuing vulnerability for Christians across Nigeria.
“Remote
villages in Nigeria’s Middle Belt region are at risk of attacks from Fulani
militants or other violent actors, and these attacks have even spread into
southern Nigeria. In the northeast, any community of believers is at risk of
attack from Boko Haram or ISWAP. Because of the violence, thousands of
Christians are forced to live in formal or informal camps for internally
displaced people (IDPs). This situation contributes to the vulnerability,
because people who have lost their home or loved ones are now effectively
refugees within their own country. Women and girls tend to have higher levels
of vulnerability as well — and anyone who converts from Islam to Christianity
is likely most vulnerable of all,” the organization states.
According
to the Armed Conflict
Location and Event Data Project (ACLED), attacks on Christians in Nigeria are
on the rise. There already have been 23
separate attacks on church premises and people linked to them so far this year.
For the whole of 2021 there were 31, and in 2020 there were 18. Included among these attacks are:
- Two
Catholic priests abducted in Katsina state on 25 May,
- Methodist
Church leader Samuel Kanu Uche kidnapped in the south-east on 29 May and
- As many as 40 worshippers killed
in a church in Ondo state in the south-west on 5 June.
During one of the Congressional delegation
visits to Nigeria in which I participated, a Muslim leader in Jos told of the
targeting by extremist elements against Muslims who didn’t observe their
ideological line. He said, “If you preach
against them during Friday prayers, you will be targeted by Saturday.”
Muslim extremists seem to have heavily
influenced Nigerian politics. It has
been a tradition in recent elections to have a Muslim and a Christian comprising
the electoral ticket, such as the current administration of Muslim President
Muhammadu Buhari and Christian Vice President Yemi Osinbajo. Of course, there have been Muslim-Muslim
tickets in the past, but in this period of rising attacks against Christians
and Muslims who are considered like infidels by extremist elements, many
Nigerian Christian leaders especially feel the selection of a Muslim Vice-Presidential
candidate by Muslim All Progressives Congress party Presidential candidate Bola
Tinubu sends a troubling message. Of course,
Tinubu likely is conceding to the reality that northerners are not accepting of
Christians who could become president.
When President Buhari was abroad for extended medical treatment several
years ago, Muslims in Parliament held up the budget, apparently so as not to
give Osinbajo a political win. They
eventually relented – perhaps because of an appeal by President Buhari, but
also because of the economic reality of governing for an extended period without
approved funding.
At any rate, during my time working in the
House Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights and
International Organizations, we held several hearings and conducted oversight
visits to examine religious persecution in Nigeria. We investigated the case of the kidnapping of
the Chibok schoolgirls, who were forced to convert to Islam, and met with numerous
Christians and Muslims attacked based on their religious beliefs. We saw many people forcibly displaced and met
with clerical leaders who told us of their houses of worship being targeted for
attacks. One man we met with – Habila Adamu
– is a Christian whose village was raided by Muslim militants who demanded he
convert to Islam. When he refused, they
shot him in the face. Fortunately, he
survived and testified before Congress about his experience.
CRFS recalls that in 2019, the Trump Administration placed Nigeria on a “Special Watch List” for religious freedom concerns under the International Religious Freedom Act. In 2020, it named Nigeria a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) for “having engaged in or tolerated particularly severe violations of religious freedom.” Designation as a CPC can result in various punitive measures (e.g., aid cuts), subject to a waiver; President Trump waived any such measures for Nigeria, citing U.S. interests. The Biden Administration did not designate Nigeria as a CPC in 2021. The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), an independent agency created by Congress, criticized Nigeria’s delisting, and they were not alone among organizations promoting religious freedom.
Shortly before Secretary of State Anthony Blinken’s visit to Nigeria in
2019, the State Department made the CPC delisting, but gave no reason for the
move other than saying Blinken, upon the advice of various department sections,
decided Nigeria didn’t meet the legal threshold for the CPC designation. They
denied the decision’s announcement was linked to Blinken’s trip but couldn’t
fully explain the timeline. Critics,
however, called Blinken’s move political, designed to appease an important
African partner. One former diplomat called it the “revenge of the bureaucracy”
at the State Department. Others questioned how it fit with the Biden
administration’s claim that human rights lie at the center of its foreign
policy.
CRS
reports that many analysts contend that religious ideology generally is not a
primary driver of such conflicts, which appear to stem primarily from disputes
over resource control pitting “Indigene” groups against “settler” Fulani – a result
of the several redrawn state boundaries over the years as mentioned earlier. During
one visit to Nigeria, I was told by an NGO group working in the country’s
Middle Belt that herder and farmer youth were collaborating in cattle theft for
profit, confirming the view that resources play a major role in conflict
between herders and farmers. Furthermore,
vigilante mobs, or
bandits not affiliated with any group, have stolen livestock or property. There
also are access to clean water issues in areas such as the Niger Delta region.
A
new administration in Nigeria coming into office through the 2023 elections
could either work to resolve this situation or make it worse. The International Republican Institute and
National Democratic Institute recently completed a pre-election assessment in
Nigeria. Their report stated:
“The 2023 elections are a departure from some
of the political dynamics that defined previous polls. For the first time since
2007, the presidential election will be an open contest with no incumbent. The
ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) selected former Lagos governor Bola
Tinubu as its flag bearer. Former Vice President and 2019 presidential
candidate Atiku Abubakar will contest on the ticket of the People’s Democratic
Party (PDP). However, the emergence of Peter Obi – former Anambra state
governor and presidential candidate for the Labour Party (LP) – and Rabiu
Kwankwaso – former Kano governor and presidential candidate for the New Nigeria
People’s Party (NNPP) – as viable “Third Forces” has excited many young
Nigerians. If a third party draws sufficient support, a runoff presidential
election could be a real possibility for the first time since the transition to
democracy, adding complexity to the 2023 elections.”
It continues: “While there have been some positive changes since
the 2019 elections, stakeholders with whom the delegation met expressed
concerns about the direction of the country. Confidence in the government and
elections has declined over the past 10 years, as exemplified by the
#EndSARS movement that gained traction in 2020 to protest security forces
abuses. In addition, insecurity has deepened, spreading to many parts of the
country. Extremist and sectarian violence continues to spread, banditry and
criminality are endemic, separatist elements are gaining traction, and informal
security forces are proliferating. This intensifying violence takes place
against a backdrop of increasing religious and regional division permeating the
political discourse. If the 2023 polls fail to improve upon past elections,
Nigerians may lose faith in the ability of democracy to deliver.”
The results of this next Nigerian election certainly are vital
to the more than 200 million Nigerians, but also to the whole West African
region, not to mention the continent.
How successful would the African Continental Free Trade Area be, for
example, without a fully participating Nigeria?
Comments
Post a Comment